Mārtiņš Staķis

That is somewhat below the Parliament average of 85 meetings per MEP, and 47 of 53 within Greens/EFA.

41% of this MEP's declared counterpart entries, including diplomatic and government entries, carry a declared EU Transparency Register link - below the like-for-like raw Parliament-wide share of 51%.

Compared with the averages

Transparency this term

Monthly declared meetings (bars) and the share of all counterpart entries carrying a declared Register link, including diplomatic and government entries (line), July 2024 to September 2026. This is the same current-term window as the figures above, beginning 16 July 2024.

Current month, partial through 11 Sep 2026: 1 declared meeting in Sep 2026, 100% of all counterpart entries carry a declared Register link. Peak: 6 in Apr 2026.

Busiest month: 6 declared in April 2026. Months with no declared meetings have no Register-share value.

Who Mārtiņš Staķis meets most

Counterparts are merged by resolved Transparency Register identity where possible. An entry counts as register-linked above only when the MEP declaration itself carries a Register link.

Where the meetings cluster

Most-met sectors

Transport & automotive (5), Technology & digital (3), Finance (1)

Meetings by committee topic

Security and Defence (23), Regional Development (3)

Most recent declared meetings

The full record is in the official EP declarations.

Roll-call voting record

Recorded votes only. Parliament held 5,568 roll-call votes while Mārtiņš Staķis held the seat, 537 of them the final vote on a text. A member with no vote recorded may have been on parliamentary business, ill, on leave, or present without voting - the published record does not distinguish these and gives no reason. Votes taken by show of hands or by secret ballot are not recorded by name and are absent here.

Final texts where Mārtiņš Staķis differed from the Greens/EFA majority

13 further instances are not listed. All roll-call votes.

Unlinked but matchable

5 counterpart entrys in Mārtiņš Staķis's declarations appear to match an EU Transparency Register entry without being linked in the declaration:

• “China Risks Limited” - likely China Risks Limited (1 counterpart entry)
• “European Logistics Platform” - likely European Logistics Platform (1 counterpart entry)
• “Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LTRK)” - likely Latvijas Tirdzniecības un rūpniecības kamera (1 counterpart entry)

Matching is automated and can be wrong - see how matching works. Linking the register entry is the fix, and it is the MEP office's to make.